|
PRESENTATION TO AD HOC COMMITTEE
CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
NON-ESSENTIAL PESTICIDE REDUCTION
My name is Mary Jane Eason. I am a community nutritionist.
I serve on the
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority Advisory Council and helped start an
Environment committee at my church. Those of us who are
supporting the
introduction of a pesticide by-law are deeply rooted in the community
and
come from a variety of ethnic, cultural and socio-economic backgrounds.
We
all share a concern for our environment and we are here to exercise our
democratic right to speak out on issues that pertain to the common
good. It
is not only a right but also a moral responsibility to do so.
There is no
doubt that in this time of history, the biggest threat to our health and
that of the eco-system stems from human behaviour. One of these
behaviours
is the unregulated use of pesticides.
I feel that the issue of pesticide use and regulation should be put into
perspective. Each period of history it seems had its own issues.
The
concern over the wonton destruction of wildlife and wildlife habitat
was the
spark that led naturalists in the 1800s' to work for the preservation
and
conservation of wildlife and wild spaces and led to the formation of
conservation organizations such as the Audubon Society and many others
later
on such as the World Wild Life Fund.
The use of pesticides and other chemicals constitutes an assault on
nature,
which we can no longer condone. Our dependence on pesticides has
created a
monster with many heads, a veritable hydra of issues and the
non-essential
use of pesticides is only one of the hydra heads. For the
protection of
our health and that of other sentient beings, I strongly support a ban
on
the cosmetic use of pesticides. I will focus on a few points to
make my
case against pesticides. It is just plain common sense to ban
pesticides.
There is nothing unusual about banning something that is harmful. Other
cities have done so and more will do so over time. Take smoking
for
example. All kinds of laws have been enacted to minimize exposure
to
second-hand smoke. We cannot see the carcinogens in smoke and the
tobacco
companies are yet to admit that smoking leads to cancer, but the
understanding of the dangers of smoking, based on numerous scientific
studies was the impetus to ban public smoking.
At the bottom of the pesticide issue, is a value system that does not
respect creation. It reflects an ignorance of the fact that
everything is
interconnected. What we do has an effect on all things. The
loss of a
species affects whole ecosystems and us, whether we recognize this or
not.
Should our pollinating insects disappear, we would surely starve for
lack of
food.
Nearly 75% of the pesticides used in green space maintenance sector are
applied to eliminate what we call undesirable plants on lawns.
Pesticides
have a negative impact on biodiversity. They eliminate and harm
beneficial
organisms. Turf grass just isn't natural and survives only under
artificial
conditions. The so-called "perfect lawn" is actually an
impoverished plant
community, - one that requires ample chemical fertilizers and
pesticides. A
good lawn is gentle to creatures like birds and predator insects thus
helping control lawn problems. It is a different sensual kind of
lawn
pleasant and safe to walk on barefoot. It is kind to children who
tumble or
roll on it without fear. It is safe for the family dog or cat to
walk on.
In our city, as long as the non-essential use of pesticides are
unregulated,
we will not have safe lawns or playgrounds.
Pesticides are deliberately added to the environment for the purpose of
killing or injuring some form of life. To quote Environment
Canada, 1987
"Pesticides are poisons or they wouldn't kill------". These
poisons end up
in our water and air as well, continuing their unseen legacy of
poisoning.
Dr. Winchester and colleagues from the Indiana School of Medicine
studied
over 27 million American births occurring between 1996 and 2002 and
found
that premature birth rates peaked when levels of pesticides and
nitrates in
surface water were at their highest from April to July and were lowest
when
the chemicals were also at their lowest levels in August to September.
The
correlation between premature birth rates and levels of nitrates and
pesticides was independent of the mother's age, education, marital
status,
alcohol consumption and smoking status. The link was also
independent of
whether the mothers lived in urban, sub urban or rural places. Dr.
Winchester and his team revealed that in an earlier 4-year study into
pregnancy outcomes in Indiana and the U.S. significant links were made
between seasonal levels of pesticides and nitrates in surface and
drinking
water and seasonal levels of birth defects.
Dr. James Lemons, Hugh McKLanden, Professor of Pediatrics and director
of
the section on neonatal -perinatal medicine at the Indiana University
School
of Medicine said this of Dr. Winchester's findings:
"I believe this work may lay the foundation for some of the most
important
basic and clinical research and public health initiatives of our time"
"To
recognize that what we put into our environment has potential pandemic
effects on pregnancy outcome and possible on child development is a
momentous observation, which hopefully will help transform the way
humanity
cares for its world"
We know and see the effects of alcohol on the fetus and the life long
consequences a child faces because his or her parents consumed alcohol
during a critical phase of fetal development. During these
critical times,
chemicals such as pesticides can have their most devastating effects on
development. Pesticides present in maternal blood can cross the
placenta to
the fetus and can disrupt the endocrine hormones in the developing
fetus.
Hormones are chemical messengers that signal and initiate many of the
body's
systems. They tell the body when to grow or to stop growing; they
initiate
sexual development and sexual differentiation; they are responsible for
our
metabolism and reproduction and ultimately for future generations.
Pesticides can mimic hormones by binding to hormone receptor sites and
triggering unpredictable results. Biologists have been sounding
the alarm
of the feminization of nature, and the discovery of scrambled sexual
organs
amongst various animals from crocodiles to panthers, making their
reproduction impossible. There is preliminary evidence of similar
effects
in human populations. The book "Our Stolen Future" is a
compilation of
scientific findings of scientists across the world all pointing in the
same
direction, that pesticides among other chemicals are hormone
disruptors, the
effects of which will be evidenced in future generations.
Cancer is a big concern and the cancer rate is rising. There is a
direct
link between pesticide exposure and cancer. Individual survival is
threatened by cancer but species survival is threatened by hormone
disruption.
Other types of chronic effects that have been associated with pesticides
include effects on development, fertility, the immune system, the
neurological system and behaviour. ADD has been related to
pesticide
exposure in a number of studies.
Recent studies from Washington provide evidence that pesticides can
cause
Parkinson's disease. One study showed that farm workers who used
paraquat
had 2 or 3 times the normal incidence of Parkinson's disease and
exposure to
another pesticide dieldrin also raised the risk of getting Parkinson's
disease. Inflammation in the brain is an effect of pesticide
exposure
(remember that pesticides are neuro toxins) and systemic inflammation
may
sensitize the brain leading to Parkinson's disease.
The Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA) is concerned about
the
dangers and is pushing for regulation of pesticide drift, which is the
movement of pesticides through the air, away form the area that they
were
applied. High concentrations of pesticides drift can cause
immediate
(acute) poisonings resulting in serious illness. Exposure may
cause birth
defects, cancer, asthma, developmental disabilities and other long-term
chronic health effects. Pesticide drift can also harm the local
environment
by contaminating waterways, air and soil, killing fish, birds and other
wildlife.
People who live near farms, in the city or suburbs can all be affected
by
drift. Pesticides sprayed onto a school sports field may drift
into the
classroom. When someone applies pesticides to the garden it may
drift into
their neighbours's yards. Pesticides can travel long distances,
even fifty
miles away from where they were applied. There are two types of
drift,
spray drift and post application drift. Spray drift occurs during
and
immediately after an application. Application drift occurs after
the
application is completed. This type of drift may be the result of
volatilization drift whereby the pesticide evaporates into a gas and
travels
long distances. It is invisible. Another type of post
application drift is
drift of pesticide-coated dust particles, which can be seen as clouds of
dust and ends up in our yards and parks and settles out. Children
are most
vulnerable to this kind of drift.
Ingestion of soil and dust containing pesticides can be an important
route
of exposure for young children. Pesticide and pesticide coated
dust
particles will be tracked into the house and deposited into carpets
where
they are slower to break down than they would outside.
In addition to the pesticide's active ingredient, virtually all
formulated
pesticide products contain "inert' substances. Pesticide products
often
contain more of the inert ingredients than they do the active ingredient
itself. But the word "inert" does not mean that the substance is
biologically, chemically or toxicologically inert. It just means
the
substance is not designed to kill the target pest. Some inerts
cause
adverse effects for example xylene used as solvents in many pesticide
products causes eye irritation, lung inflammation, nausea and leukemia.
Exposure to inerts is likely to be significant since they usually
appear in
pesticide formulations. "Inert" ingredients of pesticide products
do not
have to be disclosed and there are no requirements for toxicity testing
of
"inerts". The synergistic effect of all these chemicals is not
fully
understood but biologists are concerned about the accumulation over
time of
small exposures of many kinds of chemicals in biological systems.
There are alternatives to pesticides and there are healthy alternatives
to
pesticides for lawn care. Cosmetic pesticides should be banned
because they
are not necessary and because they affect everyone adversely.
Let's follow
the lead of progressive communities and enact a pesticide by law.
We will
be pleasantly surprised at the positive changes we will see in our own
health and that of other creatures. It was done for smoking and
it can be
done for pesticides.
Submitted by
Mary Jane Eason Phone: 772-1931
Sources:
Brochure: The Pesticides Management Code. Protecting the
environment in our
green spaces. Quebec.
Brochure: Pesticide Management Code: Highlights. Quebec.
Brochure: Pesticides Management Code. Do you wish you could roll
in the
grass?
Pesticides and Your Child. An Overview of Exposures and Risks.
Campaign
for Pesticide Reduction, Winnipeg
Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA). Pesticide Drift
Home.
http.//www.panna.org/campaigns/drift.html
PANNA. The Science of Drift.
http://www.panna.org/campaigns/driftscience.html.
Catharine Paddock: Medical News Today. U.S. Premature Births Linked to
Increases In Pesticides and Nitrates in Water. http://www.medicalnews
today.com/healthnews.php?newsid=70400.
Studies Line Up Parkinson's Pesticides Link. U. S. April, 23,
2007.
World Wildlife Fund, 1997. Pesticides, Agriculture and the
Environment:
Avoiding Hormone Disrupting Pesticides. Fact Sheet. Toronto,
Ontario.
U.S. National Research Council, 1993. Pesticides in the Diets of
Infants
and Children. National Academy Press. Washington D.C.
Theo Colborn, Dianne Dumanoski and John Peterson Myers. "Our
Stolen Future"
. Published by The Penguin Group, 1997.
|
 |